Computer projection vs Blackboard

I hear a lot from colleagues from other disciplines that blackboards are antiquated and why not use computer projections, e.g. pdfs

(in maths of course we would not use powerpoint, but write them with latex as we do for conference talks). When reading computer slides in a lecture or talk, I get terribly confused if there is too much written on them. For me, computer slides should have bullet points or a few very short clear sentences. (Shortish) definitions can go on computer slides, I’ve done that for talks. But if I were to write out a proof on a slide like that, it would take at least three or four slides, and then the lecture audience would not be able to see the beginning of the proof, let alone the statement of the result, once I’m past the first slide. In general (in this instance, meaning in CMS lecture rooms), I find blackboard the perfect medium for displaying a lot of information at once, i.e. writing out and developing the notes/proof as I go along, but being able to refer back to a definition earlier when I need it in a proof later, or the statement of the proof, or a previous result…. (if the blackboards are big enough that these things are still there, which in CMS they usually are). In Cockroft, the situation is a little different: the blackboards don’t move, are quite low, and the room is huge, so you’d have to write very large so that people at the back can see, and you couldn’t use the left side because people on the right wouldn’t see it, and you couldn’t use the right side, and you can’t write at the very bottom because it will be hidden for some people,… So by the time you’ve taken all that into account, there is not much more space there than on the overheads combined. And the overheads are at least projected high up and visible from (almost) anywhere in the room.

Advertisements

One thought on “Computer projection vs Blackboard

  1. I lectured Numbers and Sets in the Cockcroft for three years. The first two years I used the overheads, because I thought the blackboards were hopeless; writing on the overheads of course has the advantage that you face the audience as you’re doing it, but I found it harder to write legibly there than on the blackboard. The third year, I tried the experiment of doing one lecture on the overheads and one on the blackboard, and then asking the audience which they preferred; rather to my surprise, a distinct majority preferred the blackboard, so I used it for the rest of the term — though I did get constant complaints that I was writing too small for people at the back to read.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s